As most people know, I am very involved in the Nissan Skyline community in the USA. Since the Motorex days of importation, I have been dealing with owners, importers, EPA, DOT, CARB, legal and "illegal" cars.
From Motorex to Kaizo, and now onto state titled cars, I have written enough information to be a book.  Now the current chapter goes onto Steve- Vandrel from 
Skyline Owners USA forum, getting his Skyline seized by ICE.  Here is his story and pictures. 

Most people in  tuner communities throughout the United States can agree on one thing,  and that is that ‘Skyline’ is a very dirty word. Since the dawn of the  Nissan Skyline it has stood as a iconic figure to nearly everyone who  takes interest in modified vehicles from Japan, setting numerous records  on all playing fields and maintaining a well rounded reputation in many  categories. The Skyline, even at an old age, still stands proudly at  the top of the automotive food chain. While few in the country can  actually claim to have owned one either presently or previously, they  carry quite the market interest as forbidden fruit that most all wish to  someday own. 
It is never a  surprise to hear that a Skyline is being seized by
 the U.S. Government,  though it often will peak people’s interest to hear the details behind  it and get the full story. History has proven that in most cases since  the fall of Motorex, when a Skyline gets seized the owner of the vehicle  generally doesn’t have the knowledge or means to handle the situation  and walks away empty handed, leaving the government to auction the  vehicle off and collect a profit for their personal benefit. Since  Motorex was shut down the government has spent countless hours and tax  dollars to fund joint operations between government agencies in order to  hunt down and seize Skylines that they label as ‘contraband’. In a  broad spectrum it sounds pretty rediculous, to think that the government  spends tax payer’s dollars to collect up a handful of cars because they  (the government) say they are unsafe, while at the same time there’s  thousands of illegal immagrants crossing into the U.S. every day, not to  mention budget deficets and illagal activities that occur day in and  day out effecting the personal lives of American citizens. So what is  the governments real motivation for seizing Skylines? They obviously are  not making a profit out of the deal, many people are already aware that  Skylines can be purchased overseas for a fraction of U.S. market value,  that leaves one to question the overall motive.
It’s a well  known fact that Skylines are limited on importation into the U.S. Nearly  everyone in the world that knows about cars knows that it’s nearly  impossible under today’s rules to easily and affordably import a Skyline  into the United States. The rules are very clear, and while they are  set forth in the interest of saftey to the public and environment, one  still has to sit back and question “What is the REAL reason?” If a  private citizen of the U.S. wanted to purchase and import a Skyline that  is newer then 25 years of age they have to jump through numerous  different channels and rules in order to satisfy the U.S. Government and  comply with the laws and regulations in place. So what exacally is  involved in the process, in a nutshell? A person that desires to import  an approved Skyline, a 1996 R33 GTS for example, would first have to  source the vehicle and finalize purchase to obtain complete ownership.  The individual would then have to make laison with a RI (Registered  Importer) that is listed on the NHTSA’s (National Highway Transportation  Safety Administration) official RI list as well as a ICI (Independent  Commercial Importer), both of which can be found on the NHTSA’s import  information website. Under federal law, the import and modification for  FMVSS (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) of non-conforming  vehicles newer then 25 years of age must be conducted by a authorized RI  and is subject to inspection upon completion. To satisfy the  regulations set by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency),  non-conforming vehicles newer then 21 years of age must be modified and  completed by a ICI. The RI assigned to conduct the importing of the  vehicle would have to notify the NHTSA upon it’s completion and then its  at the NHTSA’s discretion to inspect the vehicle prior to release to  the owner or reserve the right to conduct a inspection at a later time,  this is commonly known as a “Bond Release” which essentially is a  release statement from the NHTSA to the RI and owner stateing that they  have reviewed the submitted package for said vehicle and that they  acknowledge it’s completion and meeting FMVSS. Subsequently the EPA also  delivers a document to further approve it’s conformance (if  applicable). At this point the RI can release the vehicle to the owner  and the owner can then apply for a titled in their respective state.
So what makes  importing such a headache and prevents other Skyline models from being  imported? One would think since Motorex imported R32’s, R33’s and R34’s  years ago that they’d be legal as well, that is where things get sticky.  When Motorex originally petitioned to the NHTSA to obtain approval to  import Skylines they jumped through all the hoops the government  required except one, crash testing. Most people did not learn of what  Motorex did until the following of their shut down by the government and  one would have to ask the question, WHY? Where Motorex screwed the  pooch was the crash testing of Skylines to obtain a stamp of approval  from the NHTSA on it’s safety compliance package to meet FMVSS. The law  requires non-conforming vehicles not approved for import to be crash  tested and have the subsequent data approved by the NHTSA before the  vehicles can be cleared for import, sounds easy right? Motorex did  infact hire a company to conduct crash testing, however, they only crash  tested one car, a R33, and the submitted data was then approved. All  good and well? Not so much. The approval that Motorex pushed through the  NHTSA was that R32’s, 33’s and 34’s were to be imported and the crash  testing data from the R33 was used for all 3 models under a  substantially similar clause that was later challenged in 2006 when the  VCP-17 approval of Skyline imports for R32’s, 33’s and 34’s was  reconsidered by the NHTSA. It was decided that the 3 models were far to  different and the fact that there was no crash test data to support the  R32’s and R34’s sealed their fate and got them removed from the  non-conforming approval list at the NHTSA. The approval for import was  later redesignated VCP-32 and only covered 1996-1998 R33’s both GTS and  GTR varients. In a nutshell, only specific Skylines can be imported as  of 2006 and there’s still a constant uphill battle over OBDII that still  has yet to see the end of the tunnel.
A interesting  topic that is commonly discussed amongst Skyline owners is what happens  to the cars that slipped into the country by unknown measures, both  carrying U.S. titles and not. Taken from a recent affidavit: “If a  vehicle is not on the list, it cannot be lawfully imported into the  United States, even if efforts can be made after importation to bring it  into compliance with FMVSS because that vehicle would not have been  legally imported into the U.S. and would have violated Customs and  Border Protection (CBP), US/DOT and EPA regulations in its importation  into the U.S.”. Unfortunetly that means that if a Skyline does not carry  a “Bond Release” from the NHTSA and applicable EPA forms then it’s not  legal. But who is to blame in a situation where a private citizen of the  U.S. purchases a Skyline in good faith and assuming that all is well?  Does the government expect all citizens to be legal experts and carry  NHTSA importation information pamplets around when shopping for  vehicles? Sure, it can be argued that the information is out there and  publicly available but let’s be honest, how many private citizens do you  know of that know what documents a non-conforming vehicle is suppost to  carry in order to be deemed legal, let alone know what the NHTSA is. I  think it’s safe to say that the vast majority of citizens probably  wouldn’t have the slightest clue as to what the NHTSA is if the term was  said to them. One would think that when purchasing a vehicle that  carries a valid U.S. title that it would be fine and dandy and so long  as it’s not listed as stolen or flagged at a DMV when applying for a  title transfer. I for one know I’ve never asked a dealership for a bond  release or EPA conformance document, and I highly doubt there’s very  many people out there who have asked for the same when purchasing any  vehicle from anyone for that matter because quite frankly it's not  something that's required for every car in the country. Again, who's to  blame? I suppose it's our faults for not being duty experts on cars with  steering wheels on the wrong side.
In the end it  comes to one simple question that the American public has to ask the  federal government, “Just how much of tax payer’s money is spent to fund  joint operations to seize Skylines across the U.S.?”. I think the same  can be asked about the budget approved for the agency overall and just  where all the money is going. In 1984 a organization was created to  expose government waste of funds, named the Citizens Against Government  Waste (CAGW). CAGW has helped expose high-profile cases of tax payer  funds being waste, most noteably the Department of Defense's $640 toilet  seat and $436 hammer. Sounds funny to think about it but it’s quite  true that those are just two examples of where our hard earned money is  spent by the government on items that everyone knows are not quite that  expensive at all. Taking into consideration that the government will  spend $640 on a toilet seat that would normally cost you and I $15 at  the local home repair store, again, leaves one to speculate on where the  money truly goes and just how big the budget is for agencies such as  the Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Investigations  (HIS), formally known as the United States Immigrations and Customs  Enforcement (ICE). I think most American citizens can agree that  investigations are not free, especially when you factor in travel  expenses and associated assets required to seize property from private  citizens.
It is clear as  of today that the U.S. Government has not put a hold on its goal to  seize Skylines and in 2011 the first known case came to light when ICE  launched an investigation into the heart of the community in the U.S.  that consists mostly of owners of Skylines, Skyline Owners USA (SOUSA).  The exact details are still being gathered and studied, however it is  evident that the government is turning up the pressure to either meet a  deadline or please someone with a lot of authority. In the past years  their investigation efforts were skewed and very unclear with no rhyme  or reason as to the direction they were heading and what their end-state  goal was. Today, it is more clear than ever that the goal is “To get  them off the road”, as stated by the Resident Agent in Charge of a local  ICE office in North Carolina.
 As the owner,  founder and community leader for Skylines Owners USA I am dedicated to  absolute and unquestionable protection of all members of the community  and I have come to the determination that action must be taken in order  to safeguard the members of the community. As of March 1st, 2011 I no  longer have anything to lose by challenging the U.S. Government  regarding Skylines and those who own them presently in the United  States. On February 11th, 2011 I received a phone call from my wife  while I was at work, she stated that it was of the upmost importance  that I leave work immediately and head home because Homeland Security  was at the doorstep and they wanted to talk to me. Needless to say I  left work with little notice and rushed home to get the scoop on what  was taking place at my residence. Just before turning the corner to my  street I fully expected to see an extraordinary amount of government  vehicles and personnel on my property, and to my surprise I saw quite  the opposite which was one car and two people. Matters were discussed  over the course of several hours and in the end it was evident that  someone somewhere had passed on some ‘bum scoop’, that I was running a  business with the sole intent of trafficking illegal non-conforming  vehicles into the U.S. by the dozens. In addition they were under the  assumption that I possessed a warehouse where I kept all of the vehicles  and also did all my automotive repair and modification work at. I  learned that nearly all of their information was based off of some word  of mouth “tip” they received and later did some research to investigate  and monitor my activities. Needless to say they were quite puzzled by  the situation they got themselves into and the lack of actual facts they  possessed when talking to me. I do not disregard or deny that there is  public information posted around various sources of the internet that  may create a image that I was operating a business of some fashion and  was able to import cars, however I made it very clear and provided  documentation for the one and only vehicle I had imported, and legally  might I add, under the 25 year rule that essentially makes all motor  vehicles domestic and imported completely exempt from FMVSS and any and  all regulatory standards via the NHTSA, not to mention the EPA at 21  years of age. I willingly turned over all documents I possessed for both  the vehicle I imported legally as well as my personal Skyline to the  agents for verification purposes on if they were actually legal  vehicles. My personal Skyline carries a very lengthy history which I of  course explained to the agents in the best details I could to include a  basic official statement of my knowledge of the vehicle’s history and  origin. Over the course of 2 weeks my papers were being cross-checked by  various government agencies to include the OVSC department of the NHTSA  as well as the EPA, I of course on the day they first arrived at my  house had prepared myself for the worst case scenario since I knew it  was a 50/50 chance on its legitimacy. I was contacted by ICE a week  after the first visit and then notified that my vehicle was found to be  illegal and that it was going to be seized, at that point they stated I  could not alter or sell my vehicle and that I had to wait for them to  issue the warrant to seize the vehicle before I could do anything at  all. A date and time was setup for them to come issue the warrant, on  March 1st, 2011 at roughly 10:30AM they visited my residence and we sat  down to finalize the paperwork for the seize of the vehicle and turn  over custody of the “contraband” to the U.S. Government. I made it very  clear that my intent was to retain ownership for the time being and  export the vehicle from the country, and that I had already made  arrangements for a sale to be conducted as well as export of the  vehicle, which of course shocked them completely since all past Skylines  seized were not owned by someone who carried the ability to execute a  export on the spot.
With no  material item left in my possession that would cause me to worry about  being questioned or investigated by the federal government any further,  as stated before, I have nothing to lose by challenging them and I  intend to do so to the fullest of my abilities and resources. Future  discussions with ICE have been mentioned and are tentatively planned,  however do not expect hourly or daily updates as much of what is to be  discussed will be legal-sensitive content for the good of the community.  All Skyline owners in the United States can rest assure that “We will  not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight!”. 
As someone in some movie said -"Shit, just got real."
Source:
 NICO Forums , and 
Skyline Owners Forum
 
Comments
seems in the US RHD owners are not granted a "honorary right". I mean that even if some R32 and R34 were imported and inspected/plated before the US decided to ban them, they should be legal because they were before the government deemed them not safe.
good luck in this battle, we're also putting up a fight in Quebec as insurance companies are starting to stop insuring us. I own an RHD 1993 toyota supra.
Thanks...
Post a Comment